Intelliloan in Wisconsin vs the state
23.1%Denial rate+9.07 pts vs state
42.9%Decision denial rate+26.50 pts vs state
30.8%Origination rate-37.38 pts vs state
6.44%Median rate-0.19 pts vs state
0.53Rate spread (pts)+0.41 pts vs state
$50kMedian applicant income
4Loans originated
3Denied
What Intelliloan lends in Wisconsin
By loan purpose
By loan type
Why it denied Wisconsin applicants
Where in Wisconsin
Counties with the most Intelliloan applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milwaukee County | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Racine County | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Taylor County | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
| Sheboygan County | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Dane County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ozaukee County | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Jefferson County | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Kenosha County | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Wood County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in Wisconsin
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summit Credit Union | A | 15,483 | 13.8% | 6.75% |
| University of Wisconsin Credit Union | A | 11,781 | 13.8% | 6.50% |
| Landmark Credit Union | A | 9,393 | 17.7% | 6.50% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 7,819 | 18.0% | 6.63% |
| Associated Bank | B | 7,451 | 23.7% | 6.88% |
| BMO Bank | F | 5,202 | 25.3% | 8.23% |
| Educators Credit Union | B | 4,930 | 24.3% | 6.95% |
| U.S. Bank | D | 4,710 | 26.0% | 6.88% |
| Covantage Credit Union | B | 4,581 | 7.7% | 6.50% |
| United Shore Financial Services | B | 4,421 | 11.8% | 6.38% |
Frequently asked questions
Wisconsin: 13 applications in 2025, of which 4 were originated and 3 denied.
23.1% of all applications, or 42.9% of the applications it actually decided on. The Wisconsin statewide average across all lenders was 14.0%.
The median rate on loans Intelliloan originated in Wisconsin in 2025 was 6.44%, against a statewide median of 6.63%.
About this data. Figures are Intelliloan's own HMDA filing for properties located in Wisconsin, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology