Tammac Holdings in Oklahoma vs the state
71.4%Denial rate+53.51 pts vs state
71.4%Decision denial rate+48.56 pts vs state
0.0%Origination rate-56.10 pts vs state
—Median rate
—Rate spread (pts)
$67kMedian applicant income
0Loans originated
15Denied
What Tammac Holdings lends in Oklahoma
By loan purpose
By loan type
Why it denied Oklahoma applicants
Where in Oklahoma
Counties with the most Tammac Holdings applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pottawatomie County | 3 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Garvin County | 3 | 0 | 3 | 100.0% |
| McCurtain County | 2 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Logan County | 2 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Bryan County | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
| Love County | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Johnston County | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Choctaw County | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Beaver County | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Tulsa County | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Other large lenders in Oklahoma
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 6,990 | 24.0% | 6.75% |
| First United Bank and Trust | C | 5,630 | 5.9% | 6.88% |
| Arvest Bank | C | 5,387 | 17.6% | 7.00% |
| 21st Mortgage | F | 5,217 | 46.8% | 9.83% |
| BancFirst | C | 4,799 | 10.0% | 7.38% |
| BOKF | D | 4,227 | 20.2% | 6.63% |
| Mortgage Research Center | C | 4,012 | 18.8% | 6.25% |
| United Shore Financial Services | B | 3,735 | 13.8% | 6.13% |
| Associated Mortgage | A | 3,213 | 0.7% | 6.50% |
| Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance | F | 2,610 | 38.3% | 9.75% |
Frequently asked questions
Oklahoma: 21 applications in 2025, of which 0 were originated and 15 denied.
71.4% of all applications, or 71.4% of the applications it actually decided on. The Oklahoma statewide average across all lenders was 17.9%.
This lender did not report interest rates on its originated loans (some institutions are exempt from HMDA pricing fields).
About this data. Figures are Tammac Holdings's own HMDA filing for properties located in Oklahoma, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology