NFM in Mississippi vs the state
0.0%Denial rate-22.92 pts vs state
0.0%Decision denial rate-28.45 pts vs state
58.3%Origination rate+5.46 pts vs state
6.88%Median rate+0.13 pts vs state
0.72Rate spread (pts)+0.39 pts vs state
$160kMedian applicant income
7Loans originated
0Denied
Trend in Mississippi
| Year | Applications | Originated | Denial rate | Median rate | Rank in state |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 7.88% | #346 |
| 2024 | 5 | 1 | 0.0% | 7.63% | #358 |
| 2025 | 12 | 7 | 0.0% | 6.88% | #277 |
What NFM lends in Mississippi
By loan purpose
By loan type
Where in Mississippi
Counties with the most NFM applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forrest County | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Harrison County | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Madison County | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Jackson County | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Yazoo County | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hancock County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in Mississippi
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21st Mortgage | F | 6,764 | 48.5% | 10.56% |
| Trustmark National Bank | C | 5,531 | 12.5% | 6.75% |
| Cadence Bank | B | 5,301 | 19.2% | 7.25% |
| Regions Bank | C | 4,916 | 44.7% | 5.75% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 4,636 | 24.8% | 6.63% |
| Community Bank of Mississippi | C | 3,856 | 9.0% | 7.65% |
| Renasant Bank | B | 3,188 | 14.3% | 6.99% |
| Triad Financial Services | D | 3,140 | 34.4% | 8.76% |
| Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance | F | 2,840 | 44.3% | 10.25% |
| BankPlus | B | 2,638 | 10.7% | 6.50% |
Frequently asked questions
Mississippi: 12 applications in 2025, of which 7 were originated and 0 denied.
0.0% of all applications, or 0.0% of the applications it actually decided on. The Mississippi statewide average across all lenders was 22.9%.
The median rate on loans NFM originated in Mississippi in 2025 was 6.88%, against a statewide median of 6.75%.
About this data. Figures are NFM's own HMDA filing for properties located in Mississippi, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology