Kiavi Funding in Mississippi vs the state
0.0%Denial rate-22.92 pts vs state
0.0%Decision denial rate-28.45 pts vs state
13.0%Origination rate-39.85 pts vs state
7.50%Median rate+0.75 pts vs state
—Rate spread (pts)
—Median applicant income
28Loans originated
0Denied
What Kiavi Funding lends in Mississippi
By loan purpose
By loan type
Where in Mississippi
Counties with the most Kiavi Funding applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hinds County | 72 | 15 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Washington County | 46 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Lee County | 39 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Coahoma County | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Itawamba County | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Alcorn County | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Prentiss County | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| DeSoto County | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Jackson County | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Harrison County | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in Mississippi
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21st Mortgage | F | 6,764 | 48.5% | 10.56% |
| Trustmark National Bank | C | 5,531 | 12.5% | 6.75% |
| Cadence Bank | B | 5,301 | 19.2% | 7.25% |
| Regions Bank | C | 4,916 | 44.7% | 5.75% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 4,636 | 24.8% | 6.63% |
| Community Bank of Mississippi | C | 3,856 | 9.0% | 7.65% |
| Renasant Bank | B | 3,188 | 14.3% | 6.99% |
| Triad Financial Services | D | 3,140 | 34.4% | 8.76% |
| Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance | F | 2,840 | 44.3% | 10.25% |
| BankPlus | B | 2,638 | 10.7% | 6.50% |
Frequently asked questions
Mississippi: 215 applications in 2025, of which 28 were originated and 0 denied.
0.0% of all applications, or 0.0% of the applications it actually decided on. The Mississippi statewide average across all lenders was 22.9%.
The median rate on loans Kiavi Funding originated in Mississippi in 2025 was 7.50%, against a statewide median of 6.75%.
About this data. Figures are Kiavi Funding's own HMDA filing for properties located in Mississippi, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology