Pike Creek Mortgage Services in Tennessee vs the state
0.0%Denial rate-17.14 pts vs state
0.0%Decision denial rate-21.68 pts vs state
60.0%Origination rate+1.92 pts vs state
6.63%Median rate0.00 pts vs state
0.47Rate spread (pts)+0.24 pts vs state
$154kMedian applicant income
9Loans originated
0Denied
What Pike Creek Mortgage Services lends in Tennessee
By loan purpose
By loan type
Where in Tennessee
Counties with the most Pike Creek Mortgage Services applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Williamson County | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Shelby County | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hamilton County | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rutherford County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Gibson County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Montgomery County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Jefferson County | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Wilson County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in Tennessee
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 16,503 | 17.3% | 6.50% |
| United Shore Financial Services | B | 12,458 | 10.9% | 6.12% |
| Regions Bank | C | 11,247 | 36.5% | 4.99% |
| Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance | F | 9,649 | 35.8% | 8.75% |
| Mortgage Research Center | C | 6,568 | 17.3% | 6.25% |
| FirstBank | C | 5,677 | 14.5% | 6.88% |
| CMG Mortgage | A | 5,643 | 2.9% | 6.50% |
| Freedom Mortgage | B | 5,493 | 8.0% | 6.25% |
| Pennymac Loan Services | C | 5,331 | 11.2% | 6.00% |
| Mortgage Investors Group | B | 4,454 | 3.5% | 6.50% |
Frequently asked questions
Tennessee: 15 applications in 2025, of which 9 were originated and 0 denied.
0.0% of all applications, or 0.0% of the applications it actually decided on. The Tennessee statewide average across all lenders was 17.1%.
The median rate on loans Pike Creek Mortgage Services originated in Tennessee in 2025 was 6.63%, against a statewide median of 6.62%.
About this data. Figures are Pike Creek Mortgage Services's own HMDA filing for properties located in Tennessee, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology