Genway Home Mortgage in Mississippi vs the state
15.4%Denial rate-7.54 pts vs state
23.5%Decision denial rate-4.92 pts vs state
50.0%Origination rate-2.87 pts vs state
7.69%Median rate+0.94 pts vs state
1.59Rate spread (pts)+1.26 pts vs state
$69kMedian applicant income
13Loans originated
4Denied
What Genway Home Mortgage lends in Mississippi
By loan purpose
By loan type
Why it denied Mississippi applicants
Where in Mississippi
Counties with the most Genway Home Mortgage applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rankin County | 5 | 4 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Adams County | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hinds County | 5 | 2 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Warren County | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Chickasaw County | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| DeSoto County | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Pontotoc County | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
| Noxubee County | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in Mississippi
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21st Mortgage | F | 6,764 | 48.5% | 10.56% |
| Trustmark National Bank | C | 5,531 | 12.5% | 6.75% |
| Cadence Bank | B | 5,301 | 19.2% | 7.25% |
| Regions Bank | C | 4,916 | 44.7% | 5.75% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 4,636 | 24.8% | 6.63% |
| Community Bank of Mississippi | C | 3,856 | 9.0% | 7.65% |
| Renasant Bank | B | 3,188 | 14.3% | 6.99% |
| Triad Financial Services | D | 3,140 | 34.4% | 8.76% |
| Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance | F | 2,840 | 44.3% | 10.25% |
| BankPlus | B | 2,638 | 10.7% | 6.50% |
Frequently asked questions
Mississippi: 26 applications in 2025, of which 13 were originated and 4 denied.
15.4% of all applications, or 23.5% of the applications it actually decided on. The Mississippi statewide average across all lenders was 22.9%.
The median rate on loans Genway Home Mortgage originated in Mississippi in 2025 was 7.69%, against a statewide median of 6.75%.
About this data. Figures are Genway Home Mortgage's own HMDA filing for properties located in Mississippi, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology