Glacier Bank in Texas vs the state
9.2%Denial rate-10.26 pts vs state
9.8%Decision denial rate-15.08 pts vs state
78.3%Origination rate+23.45 pts vs state
6.88%Median rate+0.38 pts vs state
0.20Rate spread (pts)+0.01 pts vs state
$122kMedian applicant income
94Loans originated
11Denied
What Glacier Bank lends in Texas
By loan purpose
By loan type
Why it denied Texas applicants
Where in Texas
Counties with the most Glacier Bank applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Titus County | 16 | 13 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Lamar County | 13 | 9 | 3 | 23.1% |
| Brazos County | 11 | 10 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bowie County | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hopkins County | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Franklin County | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Travis County | 5 | 3 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Gregg County | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Camp County | 4 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Dallas County | 4 | 3 | 1 | 25.0% |
Other large lenders in Texas
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Shore Financial Services | B | 56,491 | 11.0% | 6.25% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 45,658 | 22.4% | 6.63% |
| 21st Mortgage | F | 37,961 | 45.9% | 9.94% |
| Dhi Mortgage Company | B | 26,348 | 13.5% | 4.50% |
| Lennar Mortgage | A | 21,959 | 20.5% | 4.50% |
| Bank of America | F | 18,008 | 43.0% | 6.24% |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank | B | 16,260 | 9.8% | 6.45% |
| CMG Mortgage | A | 15,978 | 3.9% | 6.50% |
| Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance | F | 15,683 | 44.7% | 10.50% |
| Triad Financial Services | D | 15,158 | 50.0% | 9.35% |
Frequently asked questions
Texas: 120 applications in 2025, of which 94 were originated and 11 denied.
9.2% of all applications, or 9.8% of the applications it actually decided on. The Texas statewide average across all lenders was 19.4%.
The median rate on loans Glacier Bank originated in Texas in 2025 was 6.88%, against a statewide median of 6.50%.
About this data. Figures are Glacier Bank's own HMDA filing for properties located in Texas, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology