Nqm Funding in Idaho vs the state
16.7%Denial rate+2.22 pts vs state
16.7%Decision denial rate-0.85 pts vs state
83.3%Origination rate+20.31 pts vs state
7.62%Median rate+1.00 pts vs state
1.16Rate spread (pts)+1.01 pts vs state
$332kMedian applicant income
5Loans originated
1Denied
Trend in Idaho
| Year | Applications | Originated | Denial rate | Median rate | Rank in state |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 3 | 16.7% | 7.62% | #305 |
| 2025 | 6 | 5 | 16.7% | 7.62% | #316 |
What Nqm Funding lends in Idaho
By loan purpose
By loan type
Why it denied Idaho applicants
Where in Idaho
Counties with the most Nqm Funding applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ada County | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bingham County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Teton County | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Kootenai County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in Idaho
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho Central Credit Union | A | 15,644 | 16.5% | 7.00% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 4,391 | 13.3% | 6.63% |
| United Shore Financial Services | B | 3,943 | 9.1% | 6.12% |
| Premier Mortgage Resources | B | 2,504 | 2.7% | 6.25% |
| Mountain America Federal Credit Union | D | 2,323 | 37.7% | 7.24% |
| Guild Mortgage | A | 2,320 | 3.4% | 6.50% |
| U.S. Bank | D | 2,161 | 28.6% | 7.35% |
| Loandepot.Com | D | 1,622 | 14.2% | 6.50% |
| Glacier Bank | D | 1,507 | 14.5% | 6.88% |
| Pennymac Loan Services | C | 1,297 | 10.8% | 6.50% |
Frequently asked questions
Idaho: 6 applications in 2025, of which 5 were originated and 1 denied.
16.7% of all applications, or 16.7% of the applications it actually decided on. The Idaho statewide average across all lenders was 14.5%.
The median rate on loans Nqm Funding originated in Idaho in 2025 was 7.62%, against a statewide median of 6.63%.
About this data. Figures are Nqm Funding's own HMDA filing for properties located in Idaho, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology