Listerhill Credit Union in Mississippi vs the state
0.0%Denial rate-22.92 pts vs state
0.0%Decision denial rate-28.45 pts vs state
100.0%Origination rate+47.13 pts vs state
6.13%Median rate-0.63 pts vs state
0.12Rate spread (pts)-0.22 pts vs state
$132kMedian applicant income
5Loans originated
0Denied
Trend in Mississippi
| Year | Applications | Originated | Denial rate | Median rate | Rank in state |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | 3 | 20.0% | 6.75% | #346 |
| 2025 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 6.13% | #356 |
What Listerhill Credit Union lends in Mississippi
By loan purpose
By loan type
Where in Mississippi
Counties with the most Listerhill Credit Union applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tishomingo County | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Itawamba County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Alcorn County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in Mississippi
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21st Mortgage | F | 6,764 | 48.5% | 10.56% |
| Trustmark National Bank | C | 5,531 | 12.5% | 6.75% |
| Cadence Bank | B | 5,301 | 19.2% | 7.25% |
| Regions Bank | C | 4,916 | 44.7% | 5.75% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 4,636 | 24.8% | 6.63% |
| Community Bank of Mississippi | C | 3,856 | 9.0% | 7.65% |
| Renasant Bank | B | 3,188 | 14.3% | 6.99% |
| Triad Financial Services | D | 3,140 | 34.4% | 8.76% |
| Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance | F | 2,840 | 44.3% | 10.25% |
| BankPlus | B | 2,638 | 10.7% | 6.50% |
Frequently asked questions
Mississippi: 5 applications in 2025, of which 5 were originated and 0 denied.
0.0% of all applications, or 0.0% of the applications it actually decided on. The Mississippi statewide average across all lenders was 22.9%.
The median rate on loans Listerhill Credit Union originated in Mississippi in 2025 was 6.13%, against a statewide median of 6.75%.
About this data. Figures are Listerhill Credit Union's own HMDA filing for properties located in Mississippi, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology