Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust in Ohio vs the state
0.0%Denial rate-17.69 pts vs state
0.0%Decision denial rate-21.89 pts vs state
100.0%Origination rate+40.10 pts vs state
—Median rate
—Rate spread (pts)
—Median applicant income
6Loans originated
0Denied
Trend in Ohio
| Year | Applications | Originated | Denial rate | Median rate | Rank in state |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | #702 |
| 2025 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | — | #676 |
What Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust lends in Ohio
By loan purpose
By loan type
Where in Ohio
Counties with the most Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franklin County | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Muskingum County | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hamilton County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Clermont County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in Ohio
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Huntington National Bank | D | 42,683 | 25.8% | 7.59% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 23,165 | 18.5% | 6.63% |
| Fifth Third Bank | D | 21,939 | 25.6% | 7.50% |
| Crosscountry Mortgage | B | 16,066 | 3.1% | 6.75% |
| United Shore Financial Services | B | 14,626 | 13.1% | 6.45% |
| Third Federal Savings and Loan Association of Cleveland | C | 12,622 | 23.0% | 6.74% |
| PNC Bank | D | 11,607 | 24.6% | 7.40% |
| Wright-Patt Credit Union | C | 8,791 | 28.1% | 7.50% |
| U.S. Bank | D | 8,623 | 38.0% | 7.60% |
| Citizens Bank | C | 7,775 | 24.3% | 7.65% |
Frequently asked questions
Ohio: 6 applications in 2025, of which 6 were originated and 0 denied.
0.0% of all applications, or 0.0% of the applications it actually decided on. The Ohio statewide average across all lenders was 17.7%.
This lender did not report interest rates on its originated loans (some institutions are exempt from HMDA pricing fields).
About this data. Figures are Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust's own HMDA filing for properties located in Ohio, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology