Assurance Financial Group in Massachusetts vs the state
10.3%Denial rate-5.95 pts vs state
13.3%Decision denial rate-6.62 pts vs state
66.7%Origination rate+4.07 pts vs state
6.31%Median rate-0.31 pts vs state
0.55Rate spread (pts)+0.45 pts vs state
$117kMedian applicant income
26Loans originated
4Denied
What Assurance Financial Group lends in Massachusetts
By loan purpose
By loan type
Why it denied Massachusetts applicants
Where in Massachusetts
Counties with the most Assurance Financial Group applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plymouth County | 12 | 9 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Norfolk County | 11 | 8 | 2 | 18.2% |
| Bristol County | 9 | 5 | 1 | 11.1% |
| Hampden County | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Suffolk County | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Middlesex County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Worcester County | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in Massachusetts
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citizens Bank | C | 17,476 | 29.0% | 7.40% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 8,698 | 15.9% | 6.75% |
| Bank of America | F | 7,784 | 30.1% | 5.99% |
| Guaranteed Rate | B | 7,313 | 4.5% | 6.50% |
| Eastern Bank | B | 6,216 | 31.8% | 6.99% |
| Rockland Trust | C | 5,990 | 28.6% | 6.99% |
| Leader Bank | A | 5,913 | 1.8% | 6.25% |
| United Shore Financial Services | B | 5,898 | 12.8% | 6.50% |
| Crosscountry Mortgage | B | 5,634 | 3.8% | 6.63% |
| TD Bank | D | 3,778 | 26.9% | 7.44% |
Frequently asked questions
Massachusetts: 39 applications in 2025, of which 26 were originated and 4 denied.
10.3% of all applications, or 13.3% of the applications it actually decided on. The Massachusetts statewide average across all lenders was 16.2%.
The median rate on loans Assurance Financial Group originated in Massachusetts in 2025 was 6.31%, against a statewide median of 6.63%.
About this data. Figures are Assurance Financial Group's own HMDA filing for properties located in Massachusetts, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology