Unnamed lender 9845005BP6974AE5D838 in Arizona vs the state
21.4%Denial rate+5.20 pts vs state
27.3%Decision denial rate+6.86 pts vs state
35.7%Origination rate-23.77 pts vs state
6.81%Median rate+0.31 pts vs state
0.79Rate spread (pts)+0.57 pts vs state
$99kMedian applicant income
10Loans originated
6Denied
What Unnamed lender 9845005BP6974AE5D838 lends in Arizona
By loan purpose
By loan type
Why it denied Arizona applicants
Where in Arizona
Counties with the most Unnamed lender 9845005BP6974AE5D838 applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maricopa County | 23 | 9 | 3 | 13.0% |
| Pima County | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Mohave County | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Coconino County | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Pinal County | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Other large lenders in Arizona
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Shore Financial Services | B | 25,383 | 10.2% | 6.25% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 17,947 | 15.6% | 6.75% |
| Desert Financial Credit Union | B | 16,970 | 24.3% | 6.49% |
| Crosscountry Mortgage | B | 7,570 | 3.8% | 6.58% |
| Fairway Independent Mortgage | B | 6,729 | 5.6% | 6.63% |
| Bank of America | F | 6,229 | 32.2% | 6.24% |
| Loandepot.Com | D | 6,180 | 16.1% | 5.99% |
| Pennymac Loan Services | C | 5,838 | 11.7% | 6.62% |
| Nova Financial & Investment | C | 5,380 | 16.2% | 6.49% |
| Freedom Mortgage | B | 4,991 | 7.0% | 6.00% |
Frequently asked questions
Arizona: 28 applications in 2025, of which 10 were originated and 6 denied.
21.4% of all applications, or 27.3% of the applications it actually decided on. The Arizona statewide average across all lenders was 16.2%.
The median rate on loans Unnamed lender 9845005BP6974AE5D838 originated in Arizona in 2025 was 6.81%, against a statewide median of 6.50%.
About this data. Figures are Unnamed lender 9845005BP6974AE5D838's own HMDA filing for properties located in Arizona, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology