Citadel Servicing in Nebraska vs the state
13.3%Denial rate+0.80 pts vs state
13.3%Decision denial rate-1.81 pts vs state
60.0%Origination rate-7.28 pts vs state
7.25%Median rate+0.63 pts vs state
0.79Rate spread (pts)+0.57 pts vs state
$466kMedian applicant income
9Loans originated
2Denied
Trend in Nebraska
| Year | Applications | Originated | Denial rate | Median rate | Rank in state |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 5 | 25.0% | 8.88% | #237 |
| 2024 | 8 | 2 | 0.0% | 9.31% | #241 |
| 2025 | 15 | 9 | 13.3% | 7.25% | #225 |
What Citadel Servicing lends in Nebraska
By loan purpose
By loan type
Why it denied Nebraska applicants
Where in Nebraska
Counties with the most Citadel Servicing applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Douglas County | 12 | 7 | 2 | 16.7% |
| Sarpy County | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Lancaster County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in Nebraska
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 3,384 | 17.6% | 6.75% |
| Pinnacle Bank | B | 3,371 | 4.3% | 6.95% |
| First National Bank of Omaha | C | 2,902 | 19.6% | 7.00% |
| Charter West Bank | C | 2,258 | 6.6% | 6.50% |
| U.S. Bank | D | 2,163 | 32.9% | 6.99% |
| Veridian Credit Union | B | 2,051 | 9.8% | 6.49% |
| West Gate Bank | A | 2,040 | 5.0% | 6.50% |
| Centris | B | 2,002 | 16.3% | 6.25% |
| Union Bank and Trust | B | 1,835 | 10.0% | 6.50% |
| Mortgage Research Center | C | 1,651 | 12.5% | 6.25% |
Frequently asked questions
Nebraska: 15 applications in 2025, of which 9 were originated and 2 denied.
13.3% of all applications, or 13.3% of the applications it actually decided on. The Nebraska statewide average across all lenders was 12.5%.
The median rate on loans Citadel Servicing originated in Nebraska in 2025 was 7.25%, against a statewide median of 6.63%.
About this data. Figures are Citadel Servicing's own HMDA filing for properties located in Nebraska, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology