Reliabank Dakota in Iowa vs the state
0.0%Denial rate-12.86 pts vs state
0.0%Decision denial rate-15.31 pts vs state
90.0%Origination rate+21.54 pts vs state
6.63%Median rate+0.13 pts vs state
0.12Rate spread (pts)-0.07 pts vs state
$125kMedian applicant income
9Loans originated
0Denied
Trend in Iowa
| Year | Applications | Originated | Denial rate | Median rate | Rank in state |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 20 | 12 | 10.0% | 6.63% | #283 |
| 2024 | 15 | 9 | 20.0% | 6.38% | #302 |
| 2025 | 10 | 9 | 0.0% | 6.63% | #357 |
What Reliabank Dakota lends in Iowa
By loan purpose
By loan type
Where in Iowa
Counties with the most Reliabank Dakota applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lyon County | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Emmet County | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Story County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Harrison County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in Iowa
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GREENSTATE Credit Union | B | 13,829 | 5.9% | 6.50% |
| Veridian Credit Union | B | 8,725 | 8.9% | 6.49% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 3,761 | 22.7% | 6.63% |
| Hills Bank and Trust | A | 3,434 | 6.1% | 6.25% |
| U.S. Bank | D | 2,720 | 25.7% | 7.00% |
| Dupaco Community | A | 2,669 | 16.1% | 7.00% |
| Community Choice Credit Union | B | 2,653 | 11.8% | 6.13% |
| Iowa Bankers Mortgage | B | 2,423 | 15.4% | 6.50% |
| Broker Solutions | D | 2,386 | 6.4% | 6.75% |
| Northwest Bank | A | 2,181 | 5.7% | 6.38% |
Frequently asked questions
Iowa: 10 applications in 2025, of which 9 were originated and 0 denied.
0.0% of all applications, or 0.0% of the applications it actually decided on. The Iowa statewide average across all lenders was 12.9%.
The median rate on loans Reliabank Dakota originated in Iowa in 2025 was 6.63%, against a statewide median of 6.50%.
About this data. Figures are Reliabank Dakota's own HMDA filing for properties located in Iowa, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology