Prosperity Home Mortgage in Idaho vs the state
0.0%Denial rate-14.45 pts vs state
0.0%Decision denial rate-17.52 pts vs state
80.0%Origination rate+16.98 pts vs state
6.37%Median rate-0.25 pts vs state
0.26Rate spread (pts)+0.10 pts vs state
$254kMedian applicant income
4Loans originated
0Denied
Trend in Idaho
| Year | Applications | Originated | Denial rate | Median rate | Rank in state |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 24 | 5 | 41.7% | 6.13% | #192 |
| 2024 | 7 | 5 | 0.0% | 6.38% | #279 |
| 2025 | 5 | 4 | 0.0% | 6.37% | #327 |
What Prosperity Home Mortgage lends in Idaho
By loan purpose
By loan type
Where in Idaho
Counties with the most Prosperity Home Mortgage applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ada County | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bingham County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Canyon County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in Idaho
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho Central Credit Union | A | 15,644 | 16.5% | 7.00% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 4,391 | 13.3% | 6.63% |
| United Shore Financial Services | B | 3,943 | 9.1% | 6.12% |
| Premier Mortgage Resources | B | 2,504 | 2.7% | 6.25% |
| Mountain America Federal Credit Union | D | 2,323 | 37.7% | 7.24% |
| Guild Mortgage | A | 2,320 | 3.4% | 6.50% |
| U.S. Bank | D | 2,161 | 28.6% | 7.35% |
| Loandepot.Com | D | 1,622 | 14.2% | 6.50% |
| Glacier Bank | D | 1,507 | 14.5% | 6.88% |
| Pennymac Loan Services | C | 1,297 | 10.8% | 6.50% |
Frequently asked questions
Idaho: 5 applications in 2025, of which 4 were originated and 0 denied.
0.0% of all applications, or 0.0% of the applications it actually decided on. The Idaho statewide average across all lenders was 14.5%.
The median rate on loans Prosperity Home Mortgage originated in Idaho in 2025 was 6.37%, against a statewide median of 6.63%.
About this data. Figures are Prosperity Home Mortgage's own HMDA filing for properties located in Idaho, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology