Unnamed lender 254900RNV63A0TIZNK90 in Arizona vs the state
3.5%Denial rate-12.72 pts vs state
4.6%Decision denial rate-15.86 pts vs state
64.9%Origination rate+5.43 pts vs state
6.75%Median rate+0.25 pts vs state
0.43Rate spread (pts)+0.21 pts vs state
$142kMedian applicant income
37Loans originated
2Denied
What Unnamed lender 254900RNV63A0TIZNK90 lends in Arizona
By loan purpose
By loan type
Why it denied Arizona applicants
Where in Arizona
Counties with the most Unnamed lender 254900RNV63A0TIZNK90 applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maricopa County | 48 | 32 | 1 | 2.1% |
| Pinal County | 4 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Cochise County | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Coconino County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Yavapai County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Mohave County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in Arizona
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Shore Financial Services | B | 25,383 | 10.2% | 6.25% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 17,947 | 15.6% | 6.75% |
| Desert Financial Credit Union | B | 16,970 | 24.3% | 6.49% |
| Crosscountry Mortgage | B | 7,570 | 3.8% | 6.58% |
| Fairway Independent Mortgage | B | 6,729 | 5.6% | 6.63% |
| Bank of America | F | 6,229 | 32.2% | 6.24% |
| Loandepot.Com | D | 6,180 | 16.1% | 5.99% |
| Pennymac Loan Services | C | 5,838 | 11.7% | 6.62% |
| Nova Financial & Investment | C | 5,380 | 16.2% | 6.49% |
| Freedom Mortgage | B | 4,991 | 7.0% | 6.00% |
Frequently asked questions
Arizona: 57 applications in 2025, of which 37 were originated and 2 denied.
3.5% of all applications, or 4.6% of the applications it actually decided on. The Arizona statewide average across all lenders was 16.2%.
The median rate on loans Unnamed lender 254900RNV63A0TIZNK90 originated in Arizona in 2025 was 6.75%, against a statewide median of 6.50%.
About this data. Figures are Unnamed lender 254900RNV63A0TIZNK90's own HMDA filing for properties located in Arizona, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology