Leaderone Financial in Arizona vs the state
0.0%Denial rate-16.23 pts vs state
0.0%Decision denial rate-20.41 pts vs state
75.0%Origination rate+15.52 pts vs state
6.88%Median rate+0.38 pts vs state
0.40Rate spread (pts)+0.18 pts vs state
$184kMedian applicant income
15Loans originated
0Denied
Trend in Arizona
| Year | Applications | Originated | Denial rate | Median rate | Rank in state |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 143 | 96 | 11.9% | 7.00% | #190 |
| 2024 | 61 | 46 | 3.3% | 6.88% | #285 |
| 2025 | 20 | 15 | 0.0% | 6.88% | #416 |
What Leaderone Financial lends in Arizona
By loan purpose
By loan type
Where in Arizona
Counties with the most Leaderone Financial applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maricopa County | 14 | 12 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Pima County | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in Arizona
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Shore Financial Services | B | 25,383 | 10.2% | 6.25% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 17,947 | 15.6% | 6.75% |
| Desert Financial Credit Union | B | 16,970 | 24.3% | 6.49% |
| Crosscountry Mortgage | B | 7,570 | 3.8% | 6.58% |
| Fairway Independent Mortgage | B | 6,729 | 5.6% | 6.63% |
| Bank of America | F | 6,229 | 32.2% | 6.24% |
| Loandepot.Com | D | 6,180 | 16.1% | 5.99% |
| Pennymac Loan Services | C | 5,838 | 11.7% | 6.62% |
| Nova Financial & Investment | C | 5,380 | 16.2% | 6.49% |
| Freedom Mortgage | B | 4,991 | 7.0% | 6.00% |
Frequently asked questions
Arizona: 20 applications in 2025, of which 15 were originated and 0 denied.
0.0% of all applications, or 0.0% of the applications it actually decided on. The Arizona statewide average across all lenders was 16.2%.
The median rate on loans Leaderone Financial originated in Arizona in 2025 was 6.88%, against a statewide median of 6.50%.
About this data. Figures are Leaderone Financial's own HMDA filing for properties located in Arizona, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology