All in Federal Credit Union in Arizona vs the state
100.0%Denial rate+83.77 pts vs state
100.0%Decision denial rate+79.59 pts vs state
0.0%Origination rate-59.48 pts vs state
—Median rate
—Rate spread (pts)
$72kMedian applicant income
0Loans originated
9Denied
Trend in Arizona
| Year | Applications | Originated | Denial rate | Median rate | Rank in state |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | 80.0% | — | #604 |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | — | #523 |
What All in Federal Credit Union lends in Arizona
By loan purpose
By loan type
Why it denied Arizona applicants
Where in Arizona
Counties with the most All in Federal Credit Union applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maricopa County | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% |
| Pima County | 3 | 0 | 3 | 100.0% |
| Coconino County | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Other large lenders in Arizona
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Shore Financial Services | B | 25,383 | 10.2% | 6.25% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 17,947 | 15.6% | 6.75% |
| Desert Financial Credit Union | B | 16,970 | 24.3% | 6.49% |
| Crosscountry Mortgage | B | 7,570 | 3.8% | 6.58% |
| Fairway Independent Mortgage | B | 6,729 | 5.6% | 6.63% |
| Bank of America | F | 6,229 | 32.2% | 6.24% |
| Loandepot.Com | D | 6,180 | 16.1% | 5.99% |
| Pennymac Loan Services | C | 5,838 | 11.7% | 6.62% |
| Nova Financial & Investment | C | 5,380 | 16.2% | 6.49% |
| Freedom Mortgage | B | 4,991 | 7.0% | 6.00% |
Frequently asked questions
Arizona: 9 applications in 2025, of which 0 were originated and 9 denied.
100.0% of all applications, or 100.0% of the applications it actually decided on. The Arizona statewide average across all lenders was 16.2%.
This lender did not report interest rates on its originated loans (some institutions are exempt from HMDA pricing fields).
About this data. Figures are All in Federal Credit Union's own HMDA filing for properties located in Arizona, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology