Churchill Funding I in California vs the state
27.3%Denial rate+9.85 pts vs state
42.9%Decision denial rate+20.46 pts vs state
36.4%Origination rate-19.84 pts vs state
9.56%Median rate+2.94 pts vs state
—Rate spread (pts)
—Median applicant income
4Loans originated
3Denied
Trend in California
| Year | Applications | Originated | Denial rate | Median rate | Rank in state |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 55 | 48 | 0.0% | 10.50% | #528 |
| 2024 | 101 | 89 | 5.9% | 10.50% | #441 |
| 2025 | 11 | 4 | 27.3% | 9.56% | #723 |
What Churchill Funding I lends in California
By loan purpose
By loan type
Why it denied California applicants
Where in California
Counties with the most Churchill Funding I applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles County | 7 | 2 | 2 | 28.6% |
| Riverside County | 2 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Contra Costa County | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in California
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Shore Financial Services | B | 79,261 | 12.6% | 6.49% |
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 58,925 | 17.6% | 6.75% |
| Bank of America | F | 40,190 | 30.8% | 5.99% |
| U.S. Bank | D | 32,493 | 31.6% | 6.50% |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank | B | 22,048 | 9.7% | 6.13% |
| Spring Eq | D | 21,601 | 50.8% | 8.88% |
| Schoolsfirst | A | 19,086 | 10.0% | 6.25% |
| Pennymac Loan Services | C | 18,754 | 13.5% | 6.50% |
| Newrez | D | 17,000 | 19.3% | 6.63% |
| Loandepot.Com | D | 16,645 | 18.7% | 6.63% |
Frequently asked questions
California: 11 applications in 2025, of which 4 were originated and 3 denied.
27.3% of all applications, or 42.9% of the applications it actually decided on. The California statewide average across all lenders was 17.4%.
The median rate on loans Churchill Funding I originated in California in 2025 was 9.56%, against a statewide median of 6.63%.
About this data. Figures are Churchill Funding I's own HMDA filing for properties located in California, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology