Arbor Realty Trust in Maryland vs the state
0.0%Denial rate-18.80 pts vs state
0.0%Decision denial rate-24.13 pts vs state
80.0%Origination rate+24.29 pts vs state
6.36%Median rate-0.26 pts vs state
—Rate spread (pts)
—Median applicant income
4Loans originated
0Denied
Trend in Maryland
| Year | Applications | Originated | Denial rate | Median rate | Rank in state |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 15 | 11 | 0.0% | 5.68% | #433 |
| 2024 | 7 | 5 | 0.0% | 5.59% | #520 |
| 2025 | 5 | 4 | 0.0% | 6.36% | #538 |
What Arbor Realty Trust lends in Maryland
By loan purpose
By loan type
Where in Maryland
Counties with the most Arbor Realty Trust applications in 2025.
| County | Applications | Originated | Denied | Denial rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baltimore County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Baltimore city | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Frederick County | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
Other large lenders in Maryland
| Lender | Grade | Applications | Denial rate | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rocket Mortgage | C | 12,806 | 16.8% | 6.63% |
| Navy Federal Credit Union | D | 11,436 | 23.0% | 8.00% |
| United Shore Financial Services | B | 9,307 | 16.0% | 6.13% |
| Truist Bank | C | 6,559 | 34.9% | 6.49% |
| Bank of America | F | 6,051 | 35.8% | 6.24% |
| Newrez | D | 5,739 | 21.0% | 6.63% |
| State Employees Credit Union of Maryland | D | 5,624 | 44.6% | 6.25% |
| PNC Bank | D | 5,582 | 28.0% | 7.41% |
| Manufacturers and Traders Trust | C | 5,497 | 32.0% | 5.99% |
| Pennymac Loan Services | C | 5,411 | 12.4% | 6.49% |
Frequently asked questions
Maryland: 5 applications in 2025, of which 4 were originated and 0 denied.
0.0% of all applications, or 0.0% of the applications it actually decided on. The Maryland statewide average across all lenders was 18.8%.
The median rate on loans Arbor Realty Trust originated in Maryland in 2025 was 6.36%, against a statewide median of 6.63%.
About this data. Figures are Arbor Realty Trust's own HMDA filing for properties located in Maryland, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology