Ahl Funding · Georgia · 2025

Ahl Funding in Georgia: approval rate, denial rate and rates (2025)

Ahl Funding took 5 mortgage applications in Georgia in 2025, ranking #781 of 1,201 lenders active in the state. It originated 0.0% of them and denied 0.0% (— of the applications it decided), against a statewide denial rate of 19.2%.

5Applicationsin GA
Decision denial ratestate 25.1%
Median ratestate 6.63%
$155,000Median loanstate $235,000
$0Volume4 counties

Ahl Funding in Georgia vs the state

0.0%Denial rate-19.22 pts vs state
Decision denial rate
0.0%Origination rate-54.09 pts vs state
Median rate
Rate spread (pts)
Median applicant income
0Loans originated
0Denied

What Ahl Funding lends in Georgia

By loan purpose

Refinance 2 40% · 0.0% denied
Cash-out refinance 3 60% · 0.0% denied

By loan type

Conventional 5 100% · 0.0% denied

Where in Georgia

Counties with the most Ahl Funding applications in 2025.

CountyApplicationsOriginatedDeniedDenial rate
Richmond County 200 0.0%
Fulton County 100 0.0%
Columbia County 100 0.0%
Lincoln County 100 0.0%

Other large lenders in Georgia

LenderGradeApplicationsDenial rateMedian rate
Rocket MortgageC 29,84518.2%6.63%
United Shore Financial ServicesB 23,78412.6%6.25%
Navy Federal Credit UnionD 12,38826.4%7.95%
Truist BankC 10,56338.7%6.49%
Pennymac Loan ServicesC 10,27311.6%6.49%
Broker SolutionsD 9,7098.6%6.63%
Mortgage Research CenterC 9,44319.8%6.25%
Freedom MortgageB 9,2939.1%6.25%
Bank of AmericaF 9,16836.5%6.24%
Ameris BankB 8,06510.1%6.50%

Frequently asked questions

Georgia: 5 applications in 2025, of which 0 were originated and 0 denied.

0.0% of all applications, or — of the applications it actually decided on. The Georgia statewide average across all lenders was 19.2%.

This lender did not report interest rates on its originated loans (some institutions are exempt from HMDA pricing fields).

About this data. Figures are Ahl Funding's own HMDA filing for properties located in Georgia, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology