Anchor Loans · Alabama · 2025

Anchor Loans in Alabama: approval rate, denial rate and rates (2025)

Anchor Loans took 20 mortgage applications in Alabama in 2025, ranking #396 of 990 lenders active in the state. It originated 40.0% of them and denied 60.0% (60.0% of the applications it decided), against a statewide denial rate of 19.9%.

20Applicationsin AL
60.0%Decision denial ratestate 25.0%
10.00%Median ratestate 6.50%
$155,000Median loanstate $165,000
$2.2MVolume0 counties

Anchor Loans in Alabama vs the state

60.0%Denial rate+40.15 pts vs state
60.0%Decision denial rate+35.00 pts vs state
40.0%Origination rate-15.39 pts vs state
10.00%Median rate+3.50 pts vs state
Rate spread (pts)
Median applicant income
8Loans originated
12Denied

Trend in Alabama

YearApplicationsOriginatedDenial rateMedian rateRank in state
20238537.5%10.50%#480
202411736.4%10.50%#447
202520860.0%10.00%#396

What Anchor Loans lends in Alabama

By loan purpose

Home purchase 13 65% · 53.9% denied
Refinance 7 35% · 71.4% denied

By loan type

Conventional 20 100% · 60.0% denied

Other large lenders in Alabama

LenderGradeApplicationsDenial rateMedian rate
Regions BankC 11,87137.2%4.99%
Rocket MortgageC 9,94120.5%6.63%
Vanderbilt Mortgage and FinanceF 8,46141.4%9.50%
United Shore Financial ServicesB 7,68912.0%6.13%
21st MortgageF 6,50746.0%9.98%
Mortgage Research CenterC 5,10718.4%6.25%
REDSTONE Federal Credit UnionC 4,54818.9%8.13%
Dhi Mortgage CompanyB 3,90917.5%4.99%
Freedom MortgageB 3,7258.7%6.25%
Pennymac Loan ServicesC 3,61111.6%6.25%

Frequently asked questions

Alabama: 20 applications in 2025, of which 8 were originated and 12 denied.

60.0% of all applications, or 60.0% of the applications it actually decided on. The Alabama statewide average across all lenders was 19.9%.

The median rate on loans Anchor Loans originated in Alabama in 2025 was 10.00%, against a statewide median of 6.50%.

About this data. Figures are Anchor Loans's own HMDA filing for properties located in Alabama, 2025. The grade is national; state-level figures are shown for context and are not separately graded. Methodology